Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
  • All Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adolescents who Use Tobacco

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adolescents who Use Tobacco

Value
Compared to:

Adolescents who Use Tobacco County: Washington

Current Value:

Adolescents who Use Tobacco County: Washington

19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Counties, Washington has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MD Value (15.6%), Washington has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
MD Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (19.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.2%).
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.2%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.2%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adolescents who use any kind of tobacco product to 15.2%.</span></div>

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Washington

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Washington

42.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Counties, Washington has a value of 42.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.8%.
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MD Value (49.8%), Washington has a value of 42.8% which is lower and worse.
MD Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.6%), Washington has a value of 42.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washington (42.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (65.4%).
Prior Value
(65.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Washington

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Washington

37.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Counties, Washington has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 35.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31.1%.
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MD Value (33.2%), Washington has a value of 37.1% which is higher and better.
MD Value
(33.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.0%), Washington has a value of 37.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washington (37.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (77.5%).
Prior Value
(77.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Smoke County: Washington

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Washington

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Counties, Washington has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MD Value (10.1%), Washington has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
MD Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.4%), Washington has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washington (15.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.3%).
Prior Value
(25.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Antietam

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Antietam

14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Antietam has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Antietam has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Antietam has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Antietam has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Bagtown

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Bagtown

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Bagtown has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bagtown has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Bagtown has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Bagtown has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Beaver Creek

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Beaver Creek

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Beaver Creek has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Beaver Creek has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Beaver Creek has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Beaver Creek has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Big Pool

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Big Pool

15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Big Pool has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Big Pool has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Big Pool has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Big Pool has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Big Spring

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Big Spring

15.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Big Spring has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Big Spring has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Big Spring has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Big Spring has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Boonsboro

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Boonsboro

13.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Boonsboro has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonsboro has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Boonsboro has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Boonsboro has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Breathedsville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Breathedsville

16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Breathedsville has a value of 16.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Breathedsville has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Breathedsville has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Breathedsville has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Brownsville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Brownsville

15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Brownsville has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brownsville has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Brownsville has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Brownsville has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Cavetown

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Cavetown

17.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Cavetown has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cavetown has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Cavetown has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Cavetown has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Cearfoss

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Cearfoss

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Cearfoss has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cearfoss has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Cearfoss has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Cearfoss has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Charlton

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Charlton

13.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Charlton has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Charlton has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Charlton has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Charlton has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Chewsville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Chewsville

18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Chewsville has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Chewsville has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Chewsville has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Chewsville has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Clear Spring

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Clear Spring

13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Clear Spring has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clear Spring has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Clear Spring has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Clear Spring has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Dargan

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Dargan

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Dargan has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dargan has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Dargan has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Dargan has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Downsville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Downsville

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Downsville has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Downsville has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Downsville has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Downsville has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Edgemont

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Edgemont

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Edgemont has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Edgemont has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Edgemont has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Edgemont has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Ernstville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Ernstville

20.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Ernstville has a value of 20.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 511 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ernstville has a value of 20.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), Ernstville has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Ernstville has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fairplay

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fairplay

15.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fairplay has a value of 15.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fairplay has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Fairplay has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Fairplay has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fairview

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fairview

15.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fairview has a value of 15.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fairview has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Fairview has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Fairview has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fort Ritchie

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fort Ritchie

19.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fort Ritchie has a value of 19.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 511 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Ritchie has a value of 19.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), Fort Ritchie has a value of 19.8% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Fort Ritchie has a value of 19.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Fountainhead-Orchard Hills

Current Value:
12.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Funkstown

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Funkstown

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Funkstown has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Funkstown has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Funkstown has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Funkstown has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Gapland

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Gapland

13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Gapland has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Gapland has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Gapland has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Gapland has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Garretts Mill

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Garretts Mill

15.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Garretts Mill has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Garretts Mill has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Garretts Mill has a value of 15.5%.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Garretts Mill has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Greensburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Greensburg

16.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Greensburg has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Greensburg has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Greensburg has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Greensburg has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Hagerstown

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Hagerstown

19.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Hagerstown has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hagerstown has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Hagerstown has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Hagerstown has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Halfway

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Halfway

14.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Halfway has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Halfway has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Halfway has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Halfway has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Hancock

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Hancock

18.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Hancock has a value of 18.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hancock has a value of 18.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Hancock has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Hancock has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Highfield-Cascade

Current Value:
15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Highfield-Cascade has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Highfield-Cascade has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Highfield-Cascade has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Highfield-Cascade has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Indian Springs

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Indian Springs

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Indian Springs has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Indian Springs has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Indian Springs has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Indian Springs has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Jugtown

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Jugtown

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Jugtown has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Jugtown has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Jugtown has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Jugtown has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Keedysville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Keedysville

15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Keedysville has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Keedysville has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Keedysville has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Keedysville has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Kemps Mill

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Kemps Mill

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Kemps Mill has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kemps Mill has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Kemps Mill has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Kemps Mill has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Leitersburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Leitersburg

17.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Leitersburg has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leitersburg has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Leitersburg has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Leitersburg has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mapleville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mapleville

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Mapleville has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mapleville has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Mapleville has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mapleville has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Maugansville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Maugansville

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Maugansville has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Maugansville has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Maugansville has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Maugansville has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mercersville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mercersville

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Mercersville has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mercersville has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Mercersville has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mercersville has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Middleburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Middleburg

8.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Middleburg has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Middleburg has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Middleburg has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Middleburg has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mount Aetna

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mount Aetna

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Mount Aetna has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mount Aetna has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Mount Aetna has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mount Aetna has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mount Briar

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mount Briar

13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Mount Briar has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mount Briar has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Mount Briar has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mount Briar has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mount Lena

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Mount Lena

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Mount Lena has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mount Lena has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Mount Lena has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mount Lena has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Paramount-Long Meadow

Current Value:
13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Paramount-Long Meadow has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Paramount-Long Meadow has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Paramount-Long Meadow has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Paramount-Long Meadow has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Pecktonville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Pecktonville

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Pecktonville has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pecktonville has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Pecktonville has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Pecktonville has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Pinesburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Pinesburg

13.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Pinesburg has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinesburg has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Pinesburg has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Pinesburg has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Pondsville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Pondsville

14.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Pondsville has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pondsville has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Pondsville has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Pondsville has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Reid

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Reid

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Reid has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 511 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reid has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), Reid has a value of 15.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Reid has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Ringgold

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Ringgold

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Ringgold has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ringgold has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Ringgold has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Ringgold has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Robinwood

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Robinwood

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Robinwood has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Robinwood has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Robinwood has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Robinwood has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Rohrersville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Rohrersville

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Rohrersville has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Rohrersville has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Rohrersville has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Rohrersville has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: San Mar

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: San Mar

8.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, San Mar has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Mar has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), San Mar has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), San Mar has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Sandy Hook

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Sandy Hook

16.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Sandy Hook has a value of 16.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sandy Hook has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Sandy Hook has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Sandy Hook has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Sharpsburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Sharpsburg

15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Sharpsburg has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sharpsburg has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Sharpsburg has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Sharpsburg has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Smithsburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Smithsburg

16.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Smithsburg has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Smithsburg has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Smithsburg has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Smithsburg has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: St. James

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: St. James

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, St. James has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, St. James has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), St. James has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), St. James has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Tilghmanton

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Tilghmanton

16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Tilghmanton has a value of 16.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Tilghmanton has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Tilghmanton has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Tilghmanton has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Trego-Rohrersville Station

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Trego-Rohrersville Station has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Trego-Rohrersville Station has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Trego-Rohrersville Station has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Trego-Rohrersville Station has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Williamsport

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Williamsport

13.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Williamsport has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Williamsport has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Williamsport has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Williamsport has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Wilson-Conococheague

Current Value:
14.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Wilson-Conococheague has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Wilson-Conococheague has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Wilson-Conococheague has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Wilson-Conococheague has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Yarrowsburg

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Yarrowsburg

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Yarrowsburg has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Yarrowsburg has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), Yarrowsburg has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Yarrowsburg has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21711

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21711

13.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21711 has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21711 has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21711 has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21711 has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21713

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21713

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21713 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21713 has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21713 has a value of 13.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21713 has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21715

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21715

15.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21715 has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21715 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21715 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21715 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21719

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21719

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21719 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21719 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21719 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21719 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21722

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21722

16.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21722 has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21722 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21722 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21722 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21733

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21733

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21733 has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21733 has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21733 has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21733 has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21734

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21734

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21734 has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21734 has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21734 has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21734 has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21740

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21740

17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21740 has a value of 17.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21740 has a value of 17.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21740 has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21740 has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21742

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21742

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21742 has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21742 has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21742 has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21742 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21746

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21746

21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21746 has a value of 21.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21746 has a value of 21.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21746 has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21746 has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21750

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21750

17.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21750 has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21750 has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21750 has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21750 has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21756

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21756

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21756 has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21756 has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21756 has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21756 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21767

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21767

12.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21767 has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21767 has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21767 has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21767 has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21779

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21779

14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21779 has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21779 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21779 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21779 has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21781

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21781

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21781 has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21781 has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21781 has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21781 has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21782

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21782

14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21782 has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21782 has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21782 has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21782 has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21783

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21783

15.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21783 has a value of 15.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21783 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21783 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21783 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21795

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Zip Code: 21795

13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Zip Codes, 21795 has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MD Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 462 Maryland zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 21795 has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 21795 has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 21795 has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000100

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000100

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000100 has a value of 14.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000100 has a value of 14.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000100 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000100 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000200

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000200

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000200 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000200 has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000200 has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000200 has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000301

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000301

19.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000301 has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000301 has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000301 has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000301 has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000302

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000302

27.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000302 has a value of 27.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000302 has a value of 27.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000302 has a value of 27.5% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000302 has a value of 27.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000400

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000400

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000400 has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000400 has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000400 has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000400 has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000500

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000500

23.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000500 has a value of 23.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000500 has a value of 23.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000500 has a value of 23.1% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000500 has a value of 23.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000601

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000601

18.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000601 has a value of 18.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000601 has a value of 18.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000601 has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000601 has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000602

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000602

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000602 has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000602 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000602 has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000602 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000700

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000700

25.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000700 has a value of 25.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000700 has a value of 25.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000700 has a value of 25.1% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000700 has a value of 25.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000800

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000800

24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000800 has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000800 has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000800 has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000800 has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000900

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043000900

21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043000900 has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043000900 has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043000900 has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043000900 has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043001001

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043001001

16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043001001 has a value of 16.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043001001 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043001001 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043001001 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043001002

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043001002

15.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043001002 has a value of 15.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043001002 has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043001002 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043001002 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010100

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010100

14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010100 has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010100 has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010100 has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010100 has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010200

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010200

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010200 has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010200 has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010200 has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010200 has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010300

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010300

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010300 has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010300 has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010300 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010300 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010400

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010400

18.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010400 has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,388 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010400 has a value of 18.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), 24043010400 has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 24043010400 has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010401

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010401

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010401 has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010401 has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010401 has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010401 has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010402

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010402

15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010402 has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010402 has a value of 15.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010402 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010402 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010500

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010500

20.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010500 has a value of 20.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,388 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010500 has a value of 20.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), 24043010500 has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 24043010500 has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010600

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010600

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010600 has a value of 16.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010600 has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010600 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010600 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010700

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010700

17.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010700 has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010700 has a value of 17.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010700 has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010700 has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010801

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010801

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010801 has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,388 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010801 has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), 24043010801 has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 24043010801 has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010802

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010802

14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010802 has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010802 has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010802 has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010802 has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010803

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010803

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010803 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010803 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010803 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010803 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010900

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010900

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010900 has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,388 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010900 has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), 24043010900 has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 24043010900 has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010901

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010901

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010901 has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010901 has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010901 has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010901 has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010902

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043010902

15.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043010902 has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043010902 has a value of 15.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043010902 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043010902 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011000

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011000

21.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011000 has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011000 has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011000 has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011000 has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011100

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011100

13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011100 has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011100 has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011100 has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011100 has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011201

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011201

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011201 has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,388 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011201 has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), 24043011201 has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 24043011201 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011202

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011202

16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011202 has a value of 16.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011202 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011202 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011202 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has not been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011203

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011203

13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011203 has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011203 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011203 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011203 has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011204

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011204

15.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011204 has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011204 has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011204 has a value of 15.5%.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011204 has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011301

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011301

15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011301 has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011301 has a value of 15.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011301 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011301 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011302

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011302

11.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011302 has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011302 has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011302 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011302 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011400

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011400

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011400 has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011400 has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011400 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011400 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011500

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011500

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011500 has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,388 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011500 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (17.0%), 24043011500 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 24043011500 has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011501

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011501

14.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011501 has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011501 has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011501 has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011501 has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011502

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011502

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011502 has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011502 has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011502 has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011502 has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011600

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011600

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011600 has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011600 has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011600 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011600 has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011700

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Tract: 24043011700

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Tracts, 24043011700 has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MD Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,458 Maryland census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 24043011700 has a value of 14.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (15.5%), 24043011700 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), 24043011700 has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Maryland SHIP 2017 (15.5%), the target has  been met.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Asthma County: Washington

Current Value:

Adults with Asthma County: Washington

17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Counties, Washington has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MD Value (14.8%), Washington has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
MD Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Washington has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washington (17.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults with COPD

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Adults with COPD

Value
Compared to:

Adults with COPD County: Washington

Current Value:

Adults with COPD County: Washington

7.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Counties, Washington has a value of 7.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Washington has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Antietam

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Antietam

10.1%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Antietam has a value of 10.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Antietam has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Antietam has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Antietam has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Bagtown

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Bagtown

6.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Bagtown has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bagtown has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Bagtown has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Bagtown has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Beaver Creek

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Beaver Creek

6.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Beaver Creek has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Beaver Creek has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Beaver Creek has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Beaver Creek has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Big Pool

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Big Pool

6.4%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Big Pool has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Big Pool has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Big Pool has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Big Pool has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Big Spring

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Big Spring

11.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Big Spring has a value of 11.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Big Spring has a value of 11.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Big Spring has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Big Spring has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Boonsboro

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Boonsboro

7.1%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Boonsboro has a value of 7.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonsboro has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Boonsboro has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Boonsboro has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Breathedsville

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Breathedsville

8.7%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Breathedsville has a value of 8.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Breathedsville has a value of 8.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Breathedsville has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Breathedsville has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Brownsville

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Brownsville

8.2%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Brownsville has a value of 8.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brownsville has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Brownsville has a value of 8.2% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Brownsville has a value of 8.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Cavetown

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Cavetown

11.0%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Cavetown has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cavetown has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Cavetown has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Cavetown has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Cearfoss

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Cearfoss

8.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Cearfoss has a value of 8.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cearfoss has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Cearfoss has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Cearfoss has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Charlton

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Charlton

7.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Charlton has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Charlton has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Charlton has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Charlton has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Chewsville

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Chewsville

9.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Chewsville has a value of 9.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Chewsville has a value of 9.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Chewsville has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Chewsville has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Clear Spring

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Clear Spring

7.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Clear Spring has a value of 7.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clear Spring has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Clear Spring has a value of 7.9%.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Clear Spring has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Dargan

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Dargan

6.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Dargan has a value of 6.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dargan has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Dargan has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Dargan has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Downsville

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Downsville

7.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Downsville has a value of 7.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Downsville has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Downsville has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Downsville has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Edgemont

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Edgemont

9.0%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Edgemont has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Edgemont has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Edgemont has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Edgemont has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Ernstville

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Ernstville

7.3%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Ernstville has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 511 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ernstville has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (8.2%), Ernstville has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Ernstville has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fairplay

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fairplay

9.0%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fairplay has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fairplay has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Fairplay has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Fairplay has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fairview

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fairview

9.2%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fairview has a value of 9.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fairview has a value of 9.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Fairview has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Fairview has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fort Ritchie

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fort Ritchie

5.3%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fort Ritchie has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 511 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Ritchie has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (8.2%), Fort Ritchie has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Fort Ritchie has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Fountainhead-Orchard Hills

Current Value:
7.4%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Fountainhead-Orchard Hills has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Funkstown

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Funkstown

8.0%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Funkstown has a value of 8.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Funkstown has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Funkstown has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Funkstown has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Gapland

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Gapland

7.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Gapland has a value of 7.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Gapland has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Gapland has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Gapland has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Garretts Mill

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Garretts Mill

8.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Garretts Mill has a value of 8.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Garretts Mill has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Garretts Mill has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Garretts Mill has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with COPD Census Place: Greensburg

Current Value:

Adults with COPD Census Place: Greensburg

7.6%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MD Census Places, Greensburg has a value of 7.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
MD Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Greensburg has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washington, MD County Value (7.9%), Greensburg has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Washington, MD County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washington County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Greensburg has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.